Tweet
I am getting ready to watch it, has anyone seen it yet?
What did you think?
What did you think?
-
Be passionate about what you believe in, or why bother. -
Getting ready?Originally posted by madyaks@Feb 28 2004, 01:28 AM
I am getting ready to watch it, has anyone seen it yet?
What did you think?
Sneaky bastard....
"Can't buy what I want because it's free...
Can't buy what I want because it's free..."-- Pearl Jam, from the single Corduroy -
I saw it earlier tonight, and I thought it was...actually, it's hard to describe how I feel about the movie. It was intense, to say the least, and it was very emotional and very moving. I'd say it's definitely worth watching, but I can't really express in words how good the movie actually was. Crying while watching a movie is a very rare occurrence for me, but The Passion definitely moved me to tears. Jim Caviezel gives an amazing performance, to say the least.Comment
-
I still can't decide if I'm going to see this. I know what the Book says.Official 2014-15 Lounge Sponsor of
Jori Lehterä
"He'll Finnish You Off"Comment
-
I watched up until they were getting ready to whip him I guess, right after the Roman General refused to kill him.
I didn't want to watch any more, this is NOT a movie for kids to watch.
I'd say intense is an understatement.
And sub titles suckBe passionate about what you believe in, or why bother.Comment
-
what, did you download it or something?
i'm going to see it sometime this week. i can't wait.Official 2009 Sponsor of nobodyComment
-
There are copies floating around.Originally posted by bigJOE@Feb 28 2004, 03:43 AM
what, did you download it or something?
i'm going to see it sometime this week. i can't wait.
I think I will try to watch the rest later, not sure I was in the mood for such a deep movie after work, maybe this weekend sometime.Be passionate about what you believe in, or why bother.Comment
-
going tonight, i will try to report on it after i see it. I want to see it but i don't think i can say i am looking forward to it, that doesn't seem correct. should be interesting.
Official Sponsor of Marco Gonzales and the Productive Out!!!
Said the Quangle Wangle QueeComment
-
Leno said if the movie is successful, they might turn it into a book...Comment
-
What kind of cover art do you think they'll use? A picture of Caviezal?Leno said if the movie is successful, they might turn it into a book...His mind is not for rent, to any god or government.
Pointless debate is what we do here -- lvrComment
-
Ah, but it would never sell....Originally posted by ReggieCleveland@Feb 28 2004, 09:03 AM
Leno said if the movie is successful, they might turn it into a book...
Comment
-
My parents saw it Wednesday...Mom liked it, but Pops was caught off-guard that the movie was subtitled...said he wanted to leave after realizing that, but the old lady wouldn't let him...other than that, he seemed pretty indifferent to the movie other than it being too graphic.... . . and to tell you this: I work with gays, have friends who are gay, go to church with gays. Most of them are aware that I believe that homosexual behavior is sin. Some of them actually agree. Most don't. It's OK . . . because they also know or at least have been made aware of my multitude of sins: adulterous heart, lustful and covetous behavior, wicked pride, angry spirit . . . do I need to go on?
-mike
mike smith, post-dispatch online sports editorComment
-
I saw it last night at the Chase. There were only two things that could keep this movie from cracking my "top five movies of all time" list -- The music. It sucked -- the composer was going for a "Braveheart meets Ancient Egypt" sound, which was not period specific (not that I've heard music from 33 A.D., but I know that it doesn't sound like 16th century Egypt). IMO, this movie would have been good enough without anything in the background to distract the viewer.
- The pale creature in the black cloak. I didn't understand where this character was in the Bible. I remember having to read the Bible in grade school and high school in religion class, and I don't ever remember seeing anything in there about a pretentious metaphorical addition to the story.
Comment
-
The creature in the black cloak is not actuallyOriginally posted by steveInebriated@Feb 28 2004, 10:43 AM
I saw it last night at the Chase. There were only two things that could keep this movie from cracking my "top five movies of all time" list -- The music. It sucked -- the composer was going for a "Braveheart meets Ancient Egypt" sound, which was not period specific (not that I've heard music from 33 A.D., but I know that it doesn't sound like 16th century Egypt). IMO, this movie would have been good enough without anything in the background to distract the viewer.
- The pale creature in the black cloak. I didn't understand where this character was in the Bible. I remember having to read the Bible in grade school and high school in religion class, and I don't ever remember seeing anything in there about a pretentious metaphorical addition to the story.
in the Bible, at least not in that representation.
I assume this character is representing satan,
and his tempting of Christ to not go through
with the crucifixion, knowing that Christ was
going to die to save the world from sin.
I haven't seen the movie, planning on it,
but this is what I've heard.Comment
- The music. It sucked -- the composer was going for a "Braveheart meets Ancient Egypt" sound, which was not period specific (not that I've heard music from 33 A.D., but I know that it doesn't sound like 16th century Egypt). IMO, this movie would have been good enough without anything in the background to distract the viewer.
Comment