Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cards have second best record in NL,

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    Cards have second best record in NL,

    After 90 + loss predictions from all of the "experts". And for their great first half they rate a B+ from this guy at Yahoo:

    Pass out the midterm report cards
    http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=sh-midseasongrades070108&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
    We don't grade on a curve, and that's why only the Rays get an A-plus while three teams are given Fs.


    So my question is, do you agree? Me personally I thought they'd be a losing team so I give them an A.
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Well, all the teams rated above the Cards are AL teams except for the lone NL team with a better record than us...

    Comment

    • #3
      This is the best thread of the day. I like it.

      Fuck the fucking cubs, too. Buncha bitches....
      --Official Lounge Sponsor of Coach Mike Anderson, Colby Rasmus, and Pearl Jam.
      --Suck it cubbies.
      --Thanks to RBB for my kick ace avatar!!** --RETIRE #51!!!

      Comment

      • #4
        Originally posted by F the Cubs View Post
        This is the best thread of the day. I like it.

        Fuck the fucking cubs, too. Buncha bitches....
        You are apparently the only one. Any time I post something it gets about 2-3 responses and dies. It feels like high school all over...

        Comment

        • #5
          kjoe?

          I like it, too, and I don't see how the Cards can receive any grade other than an A.
          When you say to your neighbor, "We're having a loud party on Saturday night if that's alright with you," what you really mean is, "We're having a loud party on Saturday night."

          Comment

          • #6
            It depends on what you are using for your baseline of grading...if it's versus the pre-season predictions and expectations, then yeah, they should get an A...but if you recognize that the team is actually better than advertised, and then considered all the missed opportunities (e.g. blown saves), then they probably are about a B+...
            " Look, forget the myths the media's created about the White House--the truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand."

            Comment

            • #7
              Originally posted by JK View Post
              It depends on what you are using for your baseline of grading...if it's versus the pre-season predictions and expectations, then yeah, they should get an A...but if you recognize that the team is actually better than advertised, and then considered all the missed opportunities (e.g. blown saves), then they probably are about a B+...
              I base it on the fact that at the beginning of the year I thought the only legit starter on the staff was AW and had no confidence in Mulder, Clement or Carp pitching this year.

              Comment

              Previous template Next
              Working...
              X