Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MLB's most overpaid players: David Pinto of TSN.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MLB's most overpaid players: David Pinto of TSN.

    http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slu...=tsn&type=lgns

    Overpaying a player once is OK, as long as you learn from it
    By David Pinto - SportingNews
    12 hours, 5 minutes ago


    Going into the 2008 season, 124 baseball players hold contracts with an annual salary of $8 million or more. Getting a contract of that value generally means a player has shown his worth with great performances or long-term durability. Teams, however, sometimes overpay for past performance.

    Eighty-six of those 124 players carried over their contract from the previous season, but some did not produce enough last year to justify the salary paid. By examining these players and their contracts, is it possible to avoid such mistakes in the future?

    To evaluate a player’s output versus his salary, “Win Shares” provides a single number of a players value, including batting, fielding and pitching. The Win Shares metric, developed by Bill James, is intended to indicate the number of wins contributed by a certain player.

    Win Shares per million dollars allows the ranking of players based on bang for the buck. For the players in question here, we use the average number of win shares per season since the signing of the contract, and the average yearly value of the contract.

    For example, shortstop Orlando Cabrera played three seasons on a contract that averages $8 million annually. In that time, he posted 19.6 Win Shares per season. 19.6 Win Shares divided by $8 million results in Cabrera producing 2.45 Win Shares per million dollars—a good number. For the 86 players we are talking about, the average is 1.4 Win Shares per million dollars.

    Splitting the players into four groups provides a better way of seeing who is not producing at a level worthy of their contracts. We divided players into batters and pitchers, then subdivided them based on how far into their deals they are—short term (one or two seasons in) and long term (three or more).

    Bottom five short-term pitchers

    5. Randy Johnson, Arizona Diamondbacks: 0.3 WS/million. Johnson needed back surgery during the ‘07 season. He is throwing well in spring training so far, so it’s possible he can bring up that number in the second year of his contract.

    4. Vicente Padilla, Texas Rangers: 0.2 WS/million. He played most of the season, accumulating 23 starts with a 5.76 ERA. He struggled with elbow problems most of the year.

    3. Adam Eaton, Philadelphia Phillies: 0.2 WS/million. This was just a bad deal. Eaton never was very good and sustained a strained middle finger tendon in each of his previous two seasons. With the Phillies, he posted the worst ERA of his career.

    2. Chris Carpenter, St. Louis Cardinals: 0.0 WS/million. Carpenter made one start in ‘07 and eventually had to have Tommy John surgery. He’s not expected back until mid to late ‘08 at the earliest. He’ll basically provide no value for the first two years of a five-season contract.

    1. Jason Schmidt, Los Angeles Dodgers: 0.0 WS/million. Schmidt made six starts in ‘07 and pitched very poorly, posting a 6.31 ERA. He missed the rest of the season after shoulder surgery. He has two years left on his contract and threw pain free in his first bullpen session of the spring.

    Bottom five short-term hitters

    5. Nomar Garciaparra, Los Angeles Dodgers: 1.2 WS/million. He could not sustain his solid ‘06 campaign and fell even further off his poor ‘05 numbers. The Dodgers are rid of this contract after this season, though.

    4. Derrek Lee, Chicago Cubs: 1.1 WS/million. A great ‘05 season earned Lee a big contract for ‘06. Lee’s low rank here is based on a 50-game season in the first year of the contract. Based on ‘07, he can make this deal look a lot better over the next three seasons.

    3. Jim Edmonds, San Diego Padres: 0.95 WS/million. Edmonds saw both his on-base average and slugging percentage take a nose dive for a second year. The Padres acquired him from St. Louis in the offseason and hope for some kind of rebound in the final season of the deal.

    2. Hideki Matsui, New York Yankees: 0.9 WS/million. Once an iron man, injuries limited him to 194 games over the last two seasons.

    1. J.D. Drew, Boston Red Sox: 0.85 WS/million. Drew actually stayed healthy in ‘07, but his slugging percentage was off about 75 points from his career average. Drew has four seasons left to improve his standing.

    Bottom five long-term pitchers

    5. Jason Isringhausen, St. Louis Cardinals: 1.1 WS/million. Isringhausen is effective, but closers just don’t deliver that much in terms of Win Shares because of the few innings they work.

    4. Ben Sheets, Milwaukee Brewers: 0.9 WS/million. He signed a four-year deal after an outstanding ‘04 season. That was his third year in a row throwing 200-plus innings, but he hasn’t qualified for the ERA title since.

    3. Pedro Martinez, New York Mets: 0.6 WS/million. Injuries wiped out most of the ‘07 season and caused him to post the highest ERA of his career in ‘06.

    2. Mike Hampton, Atlanta Braves: 0.4 WS/million. He enters the last season of his eight-year contract having not pitched since ‘05.

    1. Carl Pavano, New York Yankees: 0.08 WS/million. He signed a four-year, $40 million contract after the ‘04 season, but a series of injuries have limited him to 19 starts and a 4.77 ERA with the Yankees.

    Bottom five long-term hitters

    5. Adrian Beltre, Seattle Mariners: 1.3 WS/million. He performs better than one may think, averaging 17.1 Win Shares in his three seasons with the Mariners. He just didn’t live up to his breakout final season with the Dodgers, the basis for his big contract.

    4. Manny Ramirez, Boston Red Sox: 1.3 WS/million. Yes, Manny is a great hitter. But the price tag is just too high. Note that the Yankees’ Alex Rodriguez over the length of his previous contract averaged seven more Win Shares per season than Ramirez. If you take their WS/million out to the next decimal point, Alex beats Manny 1.34 to 1.27, but still doesn’t reach the average of 1.4 WS/million. These numbers reflect superstars receiving a premium for contributing to lots of wins. It’s those extra wins that put teams over the top and into the playoffs.

    3. Garrett Anderson, Los Angeles Angels: 1.2 WS/million. This is simply a case of a team valuing batting average more than on-base average. Anderson doesn’t get on base very often for a player with such a good batting average.

    2. Jason Giambi, New York Yankees: 1.2 WS/million. His average is brought down by poor seasons in ‘04 and ‘07. He also was limited to 139 games in both the ‘05 and ‘06 seasons. Still, he has had four great years with the club—on-base averages more than .400 and slugging percentages well over .500, hitting 151 home runs.

    1. Ken Griffey, Jr., Cincinnati Reds: 1.1 WS/million. His contract seemed like a sweet deal at the time for the Reds. Griffey, however, played 140-plus games in a season just twice in eight years. He has hit 195 home runs for Cincinnati after hitting 209 in his final four years for the Mariners.

    Hitters vs. pitchers

    Note that pitchers, in general, are a poor investment. When you rank the players by Win Shares per million dollars and divide them into four even tiers, or quartiles, you get the following counts of pitchers and batters:

    WS/million quartile Pitchers Batters
    First (highest) 5 16
    Second 3 19
    Third 8 14
    Fourth (lowest) 18 3
    Total 34 52


    Nearly 53 percent of the pitchers in the study finish in the bottom quartile, compared to 5.8 percent of batters. However, many of these were in the first year of their new deals, so they have a chance to bounce back.

    Lessons learned

    What lessons can we learn from these contracts? Pitchers produce much less than hitters, so big contracts are not the best idea for pitchers. Maybe the Twins knew what they were doing in trading away Johan Santana.

    Pitchers with any injury history are bad gambles. Johnson, Pavano, Schmidt, Carpenter, Eaton and Martinez fit this mold.

    The hitters are more complicated. Great hitters simply demand a premium. It’s tough to argue that the Ramirez and Rodriguez contracts were mistakes, despite less bang per dollar. But signing older players with a history of declining productivity doesn’t work. Garciaparra, Edmonds and Anderson prove that older hitters just aren’t worth a lot of money.

    David Pinto writes and edits BaseballMusings.com and is a regular contributor to Sporting News.

    (Writer’s note: Special thanks to Cot’s
    Make America Great For Once.

  • #2
    hmmmm, 3 cardinals on that list. However this report is pretty meaningless.....
    Official Sponsor Of
    The $1.5MM Holliday cash back bonus, The "Buy Out DeWitt" campaign, and New Orleans, LA

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Hebrew Hammer View Post
      hmmmm, 3 cardinals on that list. However this report is pretty meaningless.....
      Why? Because there are three Cardinals on that list?

      "Can't buy what I want because it's free...
      Can't buy what I want because it's free..."
      -- Pearl Jam, from the single Corduroy

      Comment


      • #4
        Takes a special talent to get three people on the most overpaid list while still being a dirt-cheap tightwad of an org.

        But yeah, not a whole lot to see here, other than Don't Sign Pitchers To Long-Term Contracts, Especially Mediocre Ones.

        Comment


        • #5
          Not really sure why Izzy gets put on there. Hell there's plenty of closers who make his kind of money or more and aren't much better than he is.
          Official Lounge Sponsor
          Jim Beam, Fun Dip, and Guns 'N Roses

          2014 TP College Football Pick'em Champion

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by StlCardz1982 View Post
            Not really sure why Izzy gets put on there. Hell there's plenty of closers who make his kind of money or more and aren't much better than he is.
            Because it's win shares, which is a counting stat that doesn't care about saves (as far as I know), and it's over the life of the contract, and he contributed basically nothing in 2006.

            Comment


            • #7
              Adam Kennedy just missed out.....

              Comment


              • #8
                I see Izzy and Carpenter, who am I missing?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by ItsOnlyTheRiver View Post
                  I see Izzy and Carpenter, who am I missing?
                  I think some are including Jim Edmonds.
                  Make America Great For Once.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    We Win!
                    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law ~

                    A.C.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      There's overpaid, and then there's overpaid. Closers might not deserve big salaries but at least Isringhausen was effective.
                      Official sponsor of the St. Louis Cardinals

                      "This is a heavyweight bout indeed."--John Rooney, Oct. 27, 2011

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Adam Eaton sucks balls.
                        Official Sponsor of the National League Three-Peat.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          i like these lists, but i hate how more than half are "injured a lot, so they could come back" crap. i mean injuries happen, tell us the guys who got majorly paid and can't even catch a fly ball

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Yeah, I'm kinda wondering why they singled out Isringhausen for all closers too.

                            And I agree that factoring in injuries is ridiculous.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Having a 9 million dollar closer on a suck ass team is overpaying, regardless of how good he is. No reason for a guy with that kind of contract - for that position - on this team.

                              Moon

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X