Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
C.I.A. Was Given Data on Hijacker Long Before 9/11
Collapse
X
-
C.I.A. Was Given Data on Hijacker Long Before 9/11
Tags: None
-
Originally posted by 007@Feb 24 2004, 12:42 AM
That would make it, what, 1999?
The whole damn intelligence management needs to be flushed ASAP.
How George T. can hold onto his job is unknown to me. He must have pictures of people screwing chickens or something.
Comment
-
Originally posted by "F"_the_Cubs@Feb 24 2004, 01:46 AM
You guys aren't implying that the administration in 1999 was negligent with national security are you??
Surely not......... :o
Clinton I will not vote for you again
Dubya it's your fault to, no vote.Be passionate about what you believe in, or why bother.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pgrote@Feb 24 2004, 01:13 AM
The whole damn intelligence management needs to be flushed ASAP.
How George T. can hold onto his job is unknown to me. He must have pictures of people screwing chickens or something.
The Office of Special Plans, in particular, if fully exposed and clearly explained to the citizenry, could be quite embarrassing to Bush, Cheney, Rummy and Wolfie.
MoeThe Dude abides.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Moe_Szyslak+Feb 24 2004, 07:42 AM-->QUOTE(Moe_Szyslak @ Feb 24 2004, 07:42 AM)
Originally posted by lazydaze+Feb 24 2004, 07:45 AM-->QUOTE(lazydaze @ Feb 24 2004, 07:45 AM)Originally posted by [email protected] 24 2004, 07:42 AM
heard this theory from a Republican
By the way, Congratulations to you also. Your comments are very Kahesque. Borishly partisan.
Is that what your shooting for.Un-Official Sponsor of Randy Choate and Kevin Siegrist
Comment
I heard this theory from a Republican. It is not so far fetched. Why else would he not be fired?
Comment
Is it possible that the man has done nothing to be fired for? Intelligence is like tarot cards; sometimes you get it right, and sometimes you don't. It wasn't the CIA that was so hot to trot to go to war. That came from within the administration.
Moon
Comment
Originally posted by ReggieCleveland@Feb 24 2004, 07:51 AM
I heard this theory from a Republican. It is not so far fetched. Why else would he not be fired?
He runs the show, Reggie.
Comment
Originally posted by "F"_the_Cubs@Feb 24 2004, 12:46 AM
You guys aren't implying that the administration in 1999 was negligent with national security are you??
Surely not......... :o
Let's see - when the "intel" supposedly fails Bush (WMD) it's the CIA's fault; but when it fails Clinton, it's ... Clinton's fault.
Of course.Dude. Can. Fly.
Comment
Copyright © 2003-13, TippingPitchers.comPowered by vBulletin® Version 5.7.2
Copyright © 2023 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.All times are GMT-6. This page was generated at 04:57 AM.Working...X
Comment