Tweet
Ok, I don't want your f-ing "theories" about "the ground can't cause a fumble". I want somebody who knows the FACTS.
A receiver leaps into the air, catches the ball, gets hit and flipped sideways, and the first thing that hits the ground is his ELBOW, causing the ball to pop out.
He had never established possession by getting a foot or a knee or anything else down on the ground. Is this a catch?
Part 2: If this ISN'T a catch, then why the fuck would Martz not appeal Morton's catch at the 10 that set up a touchdown, but that assfuck DOES appeal the opening kickoff of the game, where any tool looking up at the scoreboard replay can clearly see that his return man took two steps after he caught the ball, and stepped out of bounds? WHY ISN'T SOMEBODY IN THE BOOTH TELLING MARTZ WHEN HIS APPEALS ARE FUCKED GOING IN?
Sorry, this incompetence in dealing with such a simple task angers me.
I really would like an answer to the rules question.
A receiver leaps into the air, catches the ball, gets hit and flipped sideways, and the first thing that hits the ground is his ELBOW, causing the ball to pop out.
He had never established possession by getting a foot or a knee or anything else down on the ground. Is this a catch?
Part 2: If this ISN'T a catch, then why the fuck would Martz not appeal Morton's catch at the 10 that set up a touchdown, but that assfuck DOES appeal the opening kickoff of the game, where any tool looking up at the scoreboard replay can clearly see that his return man took two steps after he caught the ball, and stepped out of bounds? WHY ISN'T SOMEBODY IN THE BOOTH TELLING MARTZ WHEN HIS APPEALS ARE FUCKED GOING IN?
Sorry, this incompetence in dealing with such a simple task angers me.
I really would like an answer to the rules question.
Comment