Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

St. Louis: We've got a problem.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • St. Louis: We've got a problem.

    Folks,

    Kevin Horrigan of the Post was not born and raised in this area. Neither was I, or a few others I've talked with. The one thing that ALL St. Louisians seem to have in common, is their lack of trust for people who weren't born and reared here.

    The St. Louis area has a lot of good things going for it, IMO. I love the central location. The weather here doesn't get too extreme. There's some pretty good fishing spots within a few hours drive. I like the Cardinals. And, there are a few other nice attractions.

    However, this area has a problem IMO, with a lack of a comprehensive "regional" approach to planning for its future. Whther it's the city, county, east side, St. Charles Co, and so on. It seems aeac of these entities are only interested in their own needs, not the needs of the entire region.

    Please take a few minutes to read, and then ponder what Kevin Horrigan is trying to convey.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    URBAN DEVELOPMENT: St. Louis, we've got a problem
    By Kevin Horrigan
    04/04/2004


    The city has plenty of good reasons to sing the blues.


    In Ron Howard's 1995 movie "Apollo 13," an oxygen tank explodes aboard a moon flight. There's pandemonium inside Mission Control. Nothing is working right. The flight director, Gene Kranz, lights a cigarette and says to one of his controllers:

    "Can we review our status here, Sy? Let's look at this thing from a standpoint of status. Uh, what have we got on the spacecraft that's good?"

    Sy, desperation on his face, turns to his console and says, "I'll get back to you, Gene."

    On the ninth or 10th viewing of this movie, it suddenly became clear: It's about St. Louis.

    Just a couple of weeks ago, Vince C. Schoemehl Jr., the city's former mayor and its youngest gray eminence, gave a speech calling for a major effort to fix St. Louis' problems. "Failure is not an option," Schoemehl said, stealing another line from "Apollo 13."


    Schoemehl, who's now president of Grand Center Inc. and a member of the city's School Board, told the Missouri Growth Association that the city has been "sliding toward irrelevance" since the 1904 World's Fair. The "morbid fascination" with the past makes us complacent about current problems, he said, mentioning the city schools and Lambert Airport.
    He was right, as far as he went. The schools are a wreck, having been run for decades mainly as a jobs program for adults rather than as an education system for kids. And the business community is apoplectic about Lambert, which lost its hub status and half its flights in November, just as the costs of a billion-dollar expansion were about to come due.

    But as we look around Mission Control, there's not much else on the spacecraft that's looking good, either.

    Growth is mostly internal, new suburbs stealing from old ones. Big employers have left, and getting back and forth to the jobs that are left is getting more difficult. Six months after the half-billion-dollar Cross County MetroLink line is completed in mid-2006, Metro will run out of money to operate it. That means either a tax increase or severe route cuts in a system that can't get people where they want to go.

    Transit works best when huge numbers of people work in one place, i.e., downtown. But now St. Charles County has as many jobs as downtown St. Louis. Between downtown and say, Winghaven, are a million people and hundreds of thousands of jobs (many of them built with tax incentives on floodplains) linked only sporadically, if at all, by the transit system.

    That puts more people and cars on the highways, which, by the way, won't be getting better any time soon because the Legislature spends a lot of the transportation money generated by the St. Louis region in outstate Missouri.

    The state spends more money on its Grape and Wine Development Program ($1.3 million) than on public transit in St. Louis ($1.2 million).

    Luckily, there's no reason to go downtown, according to the high-priced consultant hired by the Regional Chamber and Growth Association (a booster group!) who came to town and said, "Your downtown sucks."

    Great. Thirty years and billions of dollars in tax credits and incentives, new stadiums and arenas and hotels, and the guy says it sucks. Hotel operators are griping about the convention business, which was going to be downtown's salvation, particularly because casino gambling on the riverfront was going to be such a boon. The unlikely solution: more and bigger casinos.

    In his speech, Schoemehl said part of the solution was revamping the city's charter to put a strong mayor in charge. But I heard a city alderman say the other night that people were moving into the city, not out, and that the tax base was growing. This was the same alderman who allegedly urinated into a trash can during an aldermanic session a couple of years ago, so she knows what lures jobs and people.

    People who live in the county shouldn't feel too smug. I heard the county executive and his director of administration say a couple of weeks ago that the county is now "built out," and it's becoming a strain to provide a decent level of services.

    So what have we got on the spacecraft that's good? Well, it's a darn nice place to live, and the Cardinals open their season tomorrow. Legislators are all over the life-or-death issue of gay marriage.

    Failure may not be an option, but it's not anything people seem too worked up about, either.

    And how 'bout that 1904 World's Fair, huh?

    E-mail: [email protected]
    Make America Great For Once.

  • #2
    how 'bout forget the services...
    Un-Official Sponsor of Randy Choate and Kevin Siegrist

    Comment


    • #3
      A vital service called transportation has already been forgotten.
      Make America Great For Once.

      Comment


      • #4
        good, as long as they quit funding it all togehter.
        Un-Official Sponsor of Randy Choate and Kevin Siegrist

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by lazydaze@Apr 4 2004, 07:44 AM
          good, as long as they quit funding it all togehter.
          Therein lies the problem.

          We're paying gas tax, personal property taxes, and other taxes, yet the infrastructure is barely adequate.
          Make America Great For Once.

          Comment


          • #6
            I think some spots, particularly the north side, have deteriorated so severely that it's become too large of a project for anyone to tackle...they need some long-range planning, and focus on cleaning up one area at a time...


            p.s. the metrolink is a joke...how can anyone expect a public transit system like that to be successful when it only goes in a straight line?
            . . . and to tell you this: I work with gays, have friends who are gay, go to church with gays. Most of them are aware that I believe that homosexual behavior is sin. Some of them actually agree. Most don't. It's OK . . . because they also know or at least have been made aware of my multitude of sins: adulterous heart, lustful and covetous behavior, wicked pride, angry spirit . . . do I need to go on?
            -mike
            mike smith, post-dispatch online sports editor

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by OldSchoolStroker@Apr 4 2004, 07:52 AM

              p.s. the metrolink is a joke...how can anyone expect a public transit system like that to be successful when it only goes in a straight line?
              OSS,

              Excellent point.

              These trains need to go where people work (Westport, Clayton, Mastercard, Hazelwood, and the like) not just downtown.

              But, it's going to take money to get this project headed in better directions. I shudder to think of the cash that's being spent on the expansion of Lambert.
              Make America Great For Once.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by The Kev@Apr 4 2004, 07:56 AM
                I shudder to think of the cash that's being spent on the expansion of Lambert.
                Well we need all those extra runways for the...uh...all those...um...well maybe we don't, but it has provided @ least 10 years of job security for the road-crew fuckers redirecting north lindbergh...
                . . . and to tell you this: I work with gays, have friends who are gay, go to church with gays. Most of them are aware that I believe that homosexual behavior is sin. Some of them actually agree. Most don't. It's OK . . . because they also know or at least have been made aware of my multitude of sins: adulterous heart, lustful and covetous behavior, wicked pride, angry spirit . . . do I need to go on?
                -mike
                mike smith, post-dispatch online sports editor

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by The Kev@Apr 4 2004, 07:37 AM
                  A vital service called transportation has already been forgotten.
                  Surely a Libertarian is not suggesting that government spend money on such things.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    kah,

                    I'm for pay as you go, or toll roads, provided we do away with the gasoline tax and other taxes that go for road upkeep.

                    My problem is that these services are being paid for by our tax monies, but, the return for that money has been non exisitent.
                    Make America Great For Once.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I'm afraid that if you favor spending tax money on infrastructure, you need to turn in your Libertarian Party membership card.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by kah2523@Apr 4 2004, 09:14 AM
                        I'm afraid that if you favor spending tax money on infrastructure, you need to turn in your Libertarian Party membership card.
                        Where in the hell did I say I favor spending money?

                        You need to stop putting words in my mouth.

                        I said these clowns have mispent the tax monies they've already collected.

                        I want it to stop.
                        Make America Great For Once.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Actually, you're wrong OSS....the North side is RIPE for development....however, because we don't have a strong mayor form of government, you have to jump through WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY too many hoops and pay off way too many people to get any kind of project approved.
                          Are you on the list?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Horrigan's big problem is that he looks to government for solutions.

                            They're the ones who created the current mess.

                            Fire them.
                            And, frankly, it has never occured to me that "winning" a debate is important, or that I should be hurt when someone like Airshark or kah, among others (for whom winning a pseudo debate or declaring intellectual superiority over invisible others is obviously very important) ridicule me.

                            -The Artist formerly known as King in KC

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              The Kev,

                              As a native St. Louisan who has had the good fortune to live in other major metropolitan areas; I agree with your assessment. (Of course we St. Louisans don't like you outsiders telling us what's wrong with our perfect area. )

                              For many years the parochial attitude of the area has hamstrung the ability of the metropolitan area to move forward. "If you want to change things do it in someone else's backyard." When the Board of Freeholders plan was struck down in court a great opportunity to remove the walls between some of the small kingdoms that exist was lost. In my opinion this would have lead to the re-combining of the city into the county. Sorry folks, but that should be a high priority, so the two entities can begin to work together for the common good of the area. (The next county executive may not be a visionary as Buzz Westfall)

                              Some of the people in St. Charles think that they can be totally independent of St. Louis and the Missouri River will protect them. And don't even consider bringing mass transit across that river, there will be thieves and thugs transporting big screen TV's back to the hood on the buses or trains.

                              While on the subject of transportation--The W1W plan is not the best plan that could have been chosen, but another piece of concrete is necessary if St. Louis, as a region, is to keep up with other cities. Perhaps TWA would still be in business if Lambert had the "poor weather" capacity of other airports. American Airlines moved many of the flights that St. Louis handled to Chicago. I'm sure there were other factors, but the lack of an airport with a better capacity surely was a major factor. If you are a corporation looking for expansion or relocating, an airport that provides non-stop flights to many areas can be important.

                              I could probably rant on this subject forever.
                              The Redman

                              Sponsorship Available
                              Official Sponsor of Rafael Furcal

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X