Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bush: 55 Countries with worst trade barriers to US

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bush: 55 Countries with worst trade barriers to US

    For those who complain about US "protectionism" huting our ecoeonmy, here's why we need protectionist policies. If they won't level the playing field, why should we?

    http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/20...404972-ap.html

    WASHINGTON (AP) - President George W. Bush's administration cited 55 countries Thursday, including Canada, in its annual review of countries it alleges have the worst trade barriers faced by U.S. exporters.

    The report, which also named three trading groups, is intended to guide administration negotiating strategy in the coming year in attacking alleged barriers that are causing the greatest harm to U.S. companies.

    If direct talks with a country do not produce results, then the administration can bring a case against the country before international regulators with the World Trade Organization.

    The United States is running record trade deficits, with the biggest imbalance last year recorded with China, a trade gap of $124 billion US. That's the largest deficit ever recorded with a single country.

    The trade barriers report devotes 39 pages to a discussion of alleged trade barriers erected by China, including a review of the administration's efforts to persuade China to stop linking its currency to the U.S. dollar, a practice manufacturers in the United States contend undervalues the Chinese currency by as much as 40 per cent, giving products from that country a huge competitive advantage against their goods.

    Japan, which until recently was the country with the largest trade surplus with the United States, came in for 34 pages of discussion in the new report, the same number of pages devoted to discussing trade practices in the European Union the United States found objectionable.

    Countries cited in the report were: Angola, Argentina, Australia, Bolivia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ivory Coast, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Ghana, Guatemala, Honduras, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, South Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, the Philippines, Poland, Romania, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Vietnam and the trading groups of the European Union, the Arab League and the Gulf Co-operation Council.
    2005 Mandatory Loyalty Oath: I love America, our troops, baseball, Moms, and certain pies. I want no harm to come to any of those institutions, nor do I take any glee in their demise.

  • #2
    Hello - "Free Traders"? Where are you? Someone's advocating dangerous protectionist policies over here.
    2005 Mandatory Loyalty Oath: I love America, our troops, baseball, Moms, and certain pies. I want no harm to come to any of those institutions, nor do I take any glee in their demise.

    Comment


    • #3
      Trig, I part ways with you here...if we claim to lead, we MUST stand up for free trade...Bill Clinton knew this intuitively...pushed for NAFTA at political peril...protectionism is a very slippery slope...I fear it is almost inevitable, given the economic catastrophe I fear is on the horizon, but it must be resisted...it is a shortcut and an equivocation that's below us...

      Moe
      The Dude abides.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Moe_Szyslak@Apr 2 2004, 05:40 PM
        Trig, I part ways with you here...if we claim to lead, we MUST stand up for free trade...Bill Clinton knew this intuitively...pushed for NAFTA at political peril...protectionism is a very slippery slope...I fear it is almost inevitable, given the economic catastrophe I fear is on the horizon, but it must be resisted...it is a shortcut and an equivocation that's below us...

        Moe
        When the other countries on this list stop protecting their jobs and economies, I might - MIGHT - be willing to support more free trade. And that's with major caveats - like ensuring our trading partners have the same worker's rights, environmental protections, etc., that we want in the US. All the countries on that list think protectionism is helping them - are they wrong?

        But if we can't get Israel to drop trade barriers against us, for goodness sakes, something is terribly screwed up.
        2005 Mandatory Loyalty Oath: I love America, our troops, baseball, Moms, and certain pies. I want no harm to come to any of those institutions, nor do I take any glee in their demise.

        Comment


        • #5
          doesn't work like that...there will never be a clean slate...protectionism is a consequence of a human weakness: acting selfishly in the short run even though it is clearly detrimental in the long run...protectionism is a scourge that must be resisted wherever and whenever possible...like an alcoholic avoiding a drink...
          The Dude abides.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Moe_Szyslak@Apr 2 2004, 05:53 PM
            protectionism is a consequence of a human weakness: acting selfishly in the short run even though it is clearly detrimental in the long run...
            Well, I disagree. I think we need to bring other countries up to our standards before we give them "free trade". Otherwise, we're paying them not to change.
            2005 Mandatory Loyalty Oath: I love America, our troops, baseball, Moms, and certain pies. I want no harm to come to any of those institutions, nor do I take any glee in their demise.

            Comment


            • #7
              And you wonder why we get the title imperialist?
              And, frankly, it has never occured to me that "winning" a debate is important, or that I should be hurt when someone like Airshark or kah, among others (for whom winning a pseudo debate or declaring intellectual superiority over invisible others is obviously very important) ridicule me.

              -The Artist formerly known as King in KC

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Damtoft@Apr 2 2004, 06:16 PM
                And you wonder why we get the title imperialist?
                It took you 3 hours and 6 minutes to come up with that?
                2005 Mandatory Loyalty Oath: I love America, our troops, baseball, Moms, and certain pies. I want no harm to come to any of those institutions, nor do I take any glee in their demise.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Just another thread about me
                  And, frankly, it has never occured to me that "winning" a debate is important, or that I should be hurt when someone like Airshark or kah, among others (for whom winning a pseudo debate or declaring intellectual superiority over invisible others is obviously very important) ridicule me.

                  -The Artist formerly known as King in KC

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Damtoft@Apr 2 2004, 06:21 PM
                    Just another thread about me
                    Just typing in phrases at random again, JD?
                    2005 Mandatory Loyalty Oath: I love America, our troops, baseball, Moms, and certain pies. I want no harm to come to any of those institutions, nor do I take any glee in their demise.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Trigfunctions+Apr 2 2004, 06:26 PM-->
                      QUOTE (Trigfunctions @ Apr 2 2004, 06:26 PM)

                    • #12
                      Originally posted by hansolo+Apr 2 2004, 06:28 PM-->
                      QUOTE (hansolo @ Apr 2 2004, 06:28 PM)
                      Originally posted by [email protected] 2 2004, 06:26 PM

                    • #13
                      It doesn't help with usage much.
                      And, frankly, it has never occured to me that "winning" a debate is important, or that I should be hurt when someone like Airshark or kah, among others (for whom winning a pseudo debate or declaring intellectual superiority over invisible others is obviously very important) ridicule me.

                      -The Artist formerly known as King in KC

                      Comment

                      • Working...
                        X