Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sweet Jesus

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sweet Jesus

    High court sets aside adoption of `Internet twins'
    By Kelly Wiese
    Associated Press
    03/30/2004


    Tranda Wecker
    (James A. Finley/AP)

    JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) -- A mother who twice offered her twin daughters for adoption over the Internet, then changed her mind, was wrongly denied her parental rights, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled Tuesday while adding that the toddlers' subsequent adoption by foster parents should be set aside.

    A judge in St. Louis had terminated Tranda Wecker's parental rights in December 2002, leading to the twins' adoption by a St. Louis couple last May.

    It wasn't immediately clear Tuesday what the Supreme Court's 4-3 decision meant for the girls, who are now 3 years old.

    Wecker, of St. Louis, has said she was broke and under stress when she decided to put the girls up for adoption in 2000. That's when a California couple said they paid an Internet broker $6,000 to adopt the girls.

    But Wecker later decided the California couple were unfit and, joined by a British couple whom she believed would be better parents, took the twins from the California home.

    Wecker and the British couple -- who said they paid $12,000 to the Internet broker -- drove with the girls to Arkansas, where a judge approved the adoption. An Arkansas judge later voided the adoption, and the twins were placed in state custody in Missouri.

    As the case played out, Wecker became a tabloid sensation as the mother of the so-called "Internet twins."

    In its ruling Tuesday, the Supreme Court said the St. Louis judge who terminated Wecker's parental rights failed to document adequately the reasons for such a drastic step.

    "The two attempts at placement of the twins for adoption may have been mistakes, and may even have harmed the twins, but no reported Missouri case has ever held that placing a child up for adoption more than once rises to the level of abuse," Judge Richard Teitelman wrote for the Supreme Court majority.

    The court reversed the termination of Wecker's parental rights and sent the case back to the St. Louis judge.

    Supreme Court Judge William Price, in a dissent joined by two other judges, said the trial court had properly considered the evidence in terminating her rights. Price said the majority opinion "interprets the statutes solely to promote the mother's interests at the expense of the twins' well-being."

    Attorneys for Wecker had argued the adoption should not have been finalized before she exhausted her appeals.

    They also said that for much of the time before the judge's decision, Wecker's children were in foster care because she was following procedures to regain custody, such as taking parenting classes and being evaluated by a psychologist.

    "The fundamental liberty interest of natural parents in raising their children does not evaporate simply because they have not been model parents or have lost temporary custody of their children to the state," the court said.

    Attorneys for Wecker and the St. Louis juvenile office did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

  • #2
    Those kids were born into a lousy situation.

    Wecker shouldn't be allowed to have more kids.
    "Need some wood?" -- George W. Bush, October 8, 2004

    "Historians will judge if this war is just, not your punk ass." -- Dave Glover, December 8, 2004

    Comment


    • #3
      Well, those poor girls are basically guaranteed to be messed up.
      Congrats, Mom!

      Comment


      • #4
        Wecker shouldn't be allowed to have more kids.
        You need to register to vote, but any paramecium can reproduce. Goodnight, and God bless.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by phantom@Mar 30 2004, 05:05 PM
          Those kids were born into a lousy situation.

          Wecker shouldn't be allowed to have more kids.
          Phantom,

          Remember that bitch in East St. Louis who left her 11 kids at home to die in a fire, while she was out partying? That happened during the mid 80's. Anyway, the PD did a followup on her a couple years ago. She's had five or six more since then.

          If that bitch wasn't ordered to have her tubes tied and her hole stapled shut, well.......
          Make America Great For Once.

          Comment


          • #6
            Always baffling how these cocksucking liberal judges put the "rights" of sleazeball adults ahead of what's best for children.
            And, frankly, it has never occured to me that "winning" a debate is important, or that I should be hurt when someone like Airshark or kah, among others (for whom winning a pseudo debate or declaring intellectual superiority over invisible others is obviously very important) ridicule me.

            -The Artist formerly known as King in KC

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by The Kev+Mar 30 2004, 05:11 PM-->
              QUOTE (The Kev @ Mar 30 2004, 05:11 PM)

            • #8
              People in black robes have rarely understood that parenting has next to nothing to do with biology.

              Pray for a flip on appeal, or these girls are doomed.

              Comment


              • #9
                I agree with the assessments in this thread, however would add, don't underestimate eh resilience of children.

                It is why it is important to protect thier rights moreso than adults, and not write them off as doomed.
                Un-Official Sponsor of Randy Choate and Kevin Siegrist

                Comment


                • #10
                  Originally posted by lazydaze@Mar 30 2004, 05:34 PM
                  I agree with the assessments in this thread, however would add, don't underestimate eh resilience of children.

                  It is why it is important to protect thier rights moreso than adults, and not write them off as doomed.
                  Good point. Still, you hate to see them have to go through this crap because of the misdeeds of the older, wiser generation.

                  Comment


                  • #11
                    These kids are ALREADY fucked up, spending their first three years the way they have. It just remains to be seen how badly and how long recovery will take.

                    Comment


                    • #12
                      hi cg....

                      where ya been
                      Un-Official Sponsor of Randy Choate and Kevin Siegrist

                      Comment


                      • #13
                        Originally posted by ReggieCleveland@Mar 30 2004, 05:16 PM
                        People in black robes have rarely understood that parenting has next to nothing to do with biology.

                        Pray for a flip on appeal, or these girls are doomed.
                        But come on Reggie, these girls might someday need a liver transplant and if this wonderful mother isn't close by, what in the world would they do? It's all about biology. :rolleyes:
                        Official Lounge Sponsor of lasvegasreb and his shoes.

                        Comment


                        • #14
                          Good point. I'm sure Tranda has a Grade-A liver.

                          Comment

                          • Working...
                            X