Miklasz: Signs indicate Rams to dump Warner

[007]

Read all aboot'it

[Jack Sparrow]

So here is what it comes down to.........

If someone wants Bulger bad enough, we are fucked and have to use Warner or that shit bum fucker Chandler?

If not, Warner is likely headed out, and Bulger is the man.

Those are EXTREME opposites.




Only one thing solves all problems.


FIRE THAT MOTHER FUCKER MARTZ.

[Indu WangZi]

Originally posted by JackSparrow@Mar 25 2004, 01:02 AM
So here is what it comes down to.........

If someone wants Bulger bad enough, we are fucked and have to use Warner or that shit bum fucker Chandler?

If not, Warner is likely headed out, and Bulger is the man.

Those are EXTREME opposites.




Only one thing solves all problems.


FIRE THAT MOTHER FUCKER MARTZ.

Agreed...

Just hope he takes "AJ" with him :P

[CSD]

I pretty much know how this forum feels about Warner, but how would the rest of Rams Nation feel if the Rams got rid of Warner? Does he still have a lot of fans?

[CD]

Originally posted by CSD@Mar 24 2004, 11:05 PM
I pretty much know how this forum feels about Warner, but how would the rest of Rams Nation feel if the Rams got rid of Warner? Does he still have a lot of fans?

TONS.

There are people who believe the only reason Warner sucks is because his teammates intentionally don't try as hard when he is in the game.

No, I'm not kidding.

[007]

Originally posted by devaskar+Mar 25 2004, 01:08 AM-->

QUOTE (devaskar @ Mar 25 2004, 01:08 AM)

madyaks Super Moderator Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 47175 Share Tweet #7 03-25-2004, 12:27 AM Whats really amazing is how great the salary cap works :angry: The Rams may have their STARTING QUARTERBACK decided by another team bidding on THE OTHER ONE?? Great idea the cap isn't it. Be passionate about what you believe in, or why bother. Comment Post Cancel CD Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 18253 Share Tweet #8 03-25-2004, 12:29 AM Originally posted by madyaks@Mar 24 2004, 11:27 PM Whats really amazing is how great the salary cap works :angry: The Rams may have their STARTING QUARTERBACK decided by another team bidding on THE OTHER ONE?? Great idea the cap isn't it. You could also make an incredibly sound argument that the Rams never would've become any good if there was no salary cap. Comment Post Cancel madyaks Super Moderator Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 47175 Share Tweet #9 03-25-2004, 12:32 AM Originally posted by devaskar+Mar 25 2004, 02:29 AM--> QUOTE (devaskar @ Mar 25 2004, 02:29 AM) CD Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 18253 Share Tweet #10 03-25-2004, 12:34 AM Originally posted by madyaks+Mar 24 2004, 11:32 PM--> QUOTE (madyaks @ Mar 24 2004, 11:32 PM) Originally posted by devaskar@Mar 25 2004, 02:29 AM madyaks Super Moderator Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 47175 Share Tweet #11 03-25-2004, 12:37 AM Originally posted by devaskar+Mar 25 2004, 02:34 AM--> QUOTE (devaskar @ Mar 25 2004, 02:34 AM) Originally posted by madyaks@Mar 24 2004, 11:32 PM Originally posted by devaskar@Mar 25 2004, 02:29 AM kjoe Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 26527 Share Tweet #12 03-25-2004, 12:40 AM I don't know the cap rules. Whuch would be better for the Rams---release Warner in June, or keep all three qbs and trade whoever is most expendable after about eight games? Kind of scary that Bernie thinks Warner would be lucky to leave the fading Rams. v Comment Post Cancel CD Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 18253 Share Tweet #13 03-25-2004, 12:44 AM Originally posted by madyaks@Mar 24 2004, 11:37 PM But there are two sides to that, The Rams were able to get him, but the team that drafted and "raised" him were unable to keep him. I am sure their fans loved that. How fair is a cap that will force the Rams to have a QB they don't want? That part needs t be fixed. If the Rams hadn't mismanaged the cap in the first place by giving Warner that roster bonus last year, they wouldn't be in this predicament. The Rams won their Super Bowl and have had this recent era of superior football largely because the cap brought down other teams that had long histories of spending big money to win. You take the good with the bad. Rams fans can cry that the cap is forcing the dismantling of their team but these are the same fans that loved the cap in 1999 when it allowed them to get Marshall Faulk, see the long-time powers dismantle, and by extension win the Super Bowl. Would it have been better if there was no cap and the Rams didn't get Faulk and Timmerman re-signed with the Packers and more teams had cap space to bid on Trent Green and the 49ers, Packers, and Cowboys kept re-signing all of their players throughout the 1990s rather than seeing them gradually lose players every year and, by extension, the Rams didn't win the Super Bowl because there was no cap? Comment Post Cancel Damtoft Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 7867 Share Tweet #14 03-25-2004, 05:20 AM In direct opposition to the other major franchises in St. Louis, the Rams front office has a keen eye for young talent (with the notable exception of drafting defensive tackles). The cap helps the Rams far more than it hurts. And, frankly, it has never occured to me that "winning" a debate is important, or that I should be hurt when someone like Airshark or kah, among others (for whom winning a pseudo debate or declaring intellectual superiority over invisible others is obviously very important) ridicule me. -The Artist formerly known as King in KC Comment Post Cancel Celtic Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 25860 Share Tweet #15 03-25-2004, 05:28 AM Yeah that Larry Phillips guy was the bomb. Comment Post Cancel Previous 1 2 template Next English (US) Deutsch (Du) English (US) French Spanish Help Contact Us Go to top Copyright © 2003-13, TippingPitchers.com Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.0 Copyright © 2023 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. All times are GMT-6. This page was generated at 10:23 PM. Working... Yes No OK OK Cancel X 😀 🥰 🤢 😎 😡 👍 👎

[madyaks]

Whats really amazing is how great the salary cap works :angry:

The Rams may have their STARTING QUARTERBACK decided by another team bidding on THE OTHER ONE??

Great idea the cap isn't it.

[CD]

Originally posted by madyaks@Mar 24 2004, 11:27 PM
Whats really amazing is how great the salary cap works :angry:

The Rams may have their STARTING QUARTERBACK decided by another team bidding on THE OTHER ONE??

Great idea the cap isn't it.

You could also make an incredibly sound argument that the Rams never would've become any good if there was no salary cap.

[madyaks]

Originally posted by devaskar+Mar 25 2004, 02:29 AM-->

QUOTE (devaskar @ Mar 25 2004, 02:29 AM)

CD Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 18253 Share Tweet #10 03-25-2004, 12:34 AM Originally posted by madyaks+Mar 24 2004, 11:32 PM--> QUOTE (madyaks @ Mar 24 2004, 11:32 PM) Originally posted by devaskar@Mar 25 2004, 02:29 AM madyaks Super Moderator Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 47175 Share Tweet #11 03-25-2004, 12:37 AM Originally posted by devaskar+Mar 25 2004, 02:34 AM--> QUOTE (devaskar @ Mar 25 2004, 02:34 AM) Originally posted by madyaks@Mar 24 2004, 11:32 PM Originally posted by devaskar@Mar 25 2004, 02:29 AM kjoe Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 26527 Share Tweet #12 03-25-2004, 12:40 AM I don't know the cap rules. Whuch would be better for the Rams---release Warner in June, or keep all three qbs and trade whoever is most expendable after about eight games? Kind of scary that Bernie thinks Warner would be lucky to leave the fading Rams. v Comment Post Cancel CD Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 18253 Share Tweet #13 03-25-2004, 12:44 AM Originally posted by madyaks@Mar 24 2004, 11:37 PM But there are two sides to that, The Rams were able to get him, but the team that drafted and "raised" him were unable to keep him. I am sure their fans loved that. How fair is a cap that will force the Rams to have a QB they don't want? That part needs t be fixed. If the Rams hadn't mismanaged the cap in the first place by giving Warner that roster bonus last year, they wouldn't be in this predicament. The Rams won their Super Bowl and have had this recent era of superior football largely because the cap brought down other teams that had long histories of spending big money to win. You take the good with the bad. Rams fans can cry that the cap is forcing the dismantling of their team but these are the same fans that loved the cap in 1999 when it allowed them to get Marshall Faulk, see the long-time powers dismantle, and by extension win the Super Bowl. Would it have been better if there was no cap and the Rams didn't get Faulk and Timmerman re-signed with the Packers and more teams had cap space to bid on Trent Green and the 49ers, Packers, and Cowboys kept re-signing all of their players throughout the 1990s rather than seeing them gradually lose players every year and, by extension, the Rams didn't win the Super Bowl because there was no cap? Comment Post Cancel Damtoft Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 7867 Share Tweet #14 03-25-2004, 05:20 AM In direct opposition to the other major franchises in St. Louis, the Rams front office has a keen eye for young talent (with the notable exception of drafting defensive tackles). The cap helps the Rams far more than it hurts. And, frankly, it has never occured to me that "winning" a debate is important, or that I should be hurt when someone like Airshark or kah, among others (for whom winning a pseudo debate or declaring intellectual superiority over invisible others is obviously very important) ridicule me. -The Artist formerly known as King in KC Comment Post Cancel Celtic Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 25860 Share Tweet #15 03-25-2004, 05:28 AM Yeah that Larry Phillips guy was the bomb. Comment Post Cancel Previous 1 2 template Next English (US) Deutsch (Du) English (US) French Spanish Help Contact Us Go to top Copyright © 2003-13, TippingPitchers.com Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.0 Copyright © 2023 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. All times are GMT-6. This page was generated at 10:23 PM. Working... Yes No OK OK Cancel X 😀 🥰 🤢 😎 😡 👍 👎

[CD]

Originally posted by madyaks+Mar 24 2004, 11:32 PM-->

QUOTE (madyaks @ Mar 24 2004, 11:32 PM)

Originally posted by devaskar@Mar 25 2004, 02:29 AM madyaks Super Moderator Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 47175 Share Tweet #11 03-25-2004, 12:37 AM Originally posted by devaskar+Mar 25 2004, 02:34 AM--> QUOTE (devaskar @ Mar 25 2004, 02:34 AM) Originally posted by madyaks@Mar 24 2004, 11:32 PM Originally posted by devaskar@Mar 25 2004, 02:29 AM kjoe Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 26527 Share Tweet #12 03-25-2004, 12:40 AM I don't know the cap rules. Whuch would be better for the Rams---release Warner in June, or keep all three qbs and trade whoever is most expendable after about eight games? Kind of scary that Bernie thinks Warner would be lucky to leave the fading Rams. v Comment Post Cancel CD Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 18253 Share Tweet #13 03-25-2004, 12:44 AM Originally posted by madyaks@Mar 24 2004, 11:37 PM But there are two sides to that, The Rams were able to get him, but the team that drafted and "raised" him were unable to keep him. I am sure their fans loved that. How fair is a cap that will force the Rams to have a QB they don't want? That part needs t be fixed. If the Rams hadn't mismanaged the cap in the first place by giving Warner that roster bonus last year, they wouldn't be in this predicament. The Rams won their Super Bowl and have had this recent era of superior football largely because the cap brought down other teams that had long histories of spending big money to win. You take the good with the bad. Rams fans can cry that the cap is forcing the dismantling of their team but these are the same fans that loved the cap in 1999 when it allowed them to get Marshall Faulk, see the long-time powers dismantle, and by extension win the Super Bowl. Would it have been better if there was no cap and the Rams didn't get Faulk and Timmerman re-signed with the Packers and more teams had cap space to bid on Trent Green and the 49ers, Packers, and Cowboys kept re-signing all of their players throughout the 1990s rather than seeing them gradually lose players every year and, by extension, the Rams didn't win the Super Bowl because there was no cap? Comment Post Cancel Damtoft Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 7867 Share Tweet #14 03-25-2004, 05:20 AM In direct opposition to the other major franchises in St. Louis, the Rams front office has a keen eye for young talent (with the notable exception of drafting defensive tackles). The cap helps the Rams far more than it hurts. And, frankly, it has never occured to me that "winning" a debate is important, or that I should be hurt when someone like Airshark or kah, among others (for whom winning a pseudo debate or declaring intellectual superiority over invisible others is obviously very important) ridicule me. -The Artist formerly known as King in KC Comment Post Cancel Celtic Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 25860 Share Tweet #15 03-25-2004, 05:28 AM Yeah that Larry Phillips guy was the bomb. Comment Post Cancel Previous 1 2 template Next English (US) Deutsch (Du) English (US) French Spanish Help Contact Us Go to top Copyright © 2003-13, TippingPitchers.com Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.0 Copyright © 2023 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. All times are GMT-6. This page was generated at 10:23 PM. Working... Yes No OK OK Cancel X 😀 🥰 🤢 😎 😡 👍 👎

[madyaks]

Originally posted by devaskar+Mar 25 2004, 02:34 AM-->

QUOTE (devaskar @ Mar 25 2004, 02:34 AM)

Originally posted by madyaks@Mar 24 2004, 11:32 PM Originally posted by devaskar@Mar 25 2004, 02:29 AM kjoe Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 26527 Share Tweet #12 03-25-2004, 12:40 AM I don't know the cap rules. Whuch would be better for the Rams---release Warner in June, or keep all three qbs and trade whoever is most expendable after about eight games? Kind of scary that Bernie thinks Warner would be lucky to leave the fading Rams. v Comment Post Cancel CD Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 18253 Share Tweet #13 03-25-2004, 12:44 AM Originally posted by madyaks@Mar 24 2004, 11:37 PM But there are two sides to that, The Rams were able to get him, but the team that drafted and "raised" him were unable to keep him. I am sure their fans loved that. How fair is a cap that will force the Rams to have a QB they don't want? That part needs t be fixed. If the Rams hadn't mismanaged the cap in the first place by giving Warner that roster bonus last year, they wouldn't be in this predicament. The Rams won their Super Bowl and have had this recent era of superior football largely because the cap brought down other teams that had long histories of spending big money to win. You take the good with the bad. Rams fans can cry that the cap is forcing the dismantling of their team but these are the same fans that loved the cap in 1999 when it allowed them to get Marshall Faulk, see the long-time powers dismantle, and by extension win the Super Bowl. Would it have been better if there was no cap and the Rams didn't get Faulk and Timmerman re-signed with the Packers and more teams had cap space to bid on Trent Green and the 49ers, Packers, and Cowboys kept re-signing all of their players throughout the 1990s rather than seeing them gradually lose players every year and, by extension, the Rams didn't win the Super Bowl because there was no cap? Comment Post Cancel Damtoft Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 7867 Share Tweet #14 03-25-2004, 05:20 AM In direct opposition to the other major franchises in St. Louis, the Rams front office has a keen eye for young talent (with the notable exception of drafting defensive tackles). The cap helps the Rams far more than it hurts. And, frankly, it has never occured to me that "winning" a debate is important, or that I should be hurt when someone like Airshark or kah, among others (for whom winning a pseudo debate or declaring intellectual superiority over invisible others is obviously very important) ridicule me. -The Artist formerly known as King in KC Comment Post Cancel Celtic Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 25860 Share Tweet #15 03-25-2004, 05:28 AM Yeah that Larry Phillips guy was the bomb. Comment Post Cancel Previous 1 2 template Next English (US) Deutsch (Du) English (US) French Spanish Help Contact Us Go to top Copyright © 2003-13, TippingPitchers.com Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.0 Copyright © 2023 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. All times are GMT-6. This page was generated at 10:23 PM. Working... Yes No OK OK Cancel X 😀 🥰 🤢 😎 😡 👍 👎

[kjoe]

I don't know the cap rules. Whuch would be better for the Rams---release Warner in June, or keep all three qbs and trade whoever is most expendable after about eight games? Kind of scary that Bernie thinks Warner would be lucky to leave the fading Rams.

[CD]

Originally posted by madyaks@Mar 24 2004, 11:37 PM
But there are two sides to that, The Rams were able to get him, but the team that drafted and "raised" him were unable to keep him. I am sure their fans loved that.

How fair is a cap that will force the Rams to have a QB they don't want?
That part needs t be fixed.

If the Rams hadn't mismanaged the cap in the first place by giving Warner that roster bonus last year, they wouldn't be in this predicament.

The Rams won their Super Bowl and have had this recent era of superior football largely because the cap brought down other teams that had long histories of spending big money to win. You take the good with the bad. Rams fans can cry that the cap is forcing the dismantling of their team but these are the same fans that loved the cap in 1999 when it allowed them to get Marshall Faulk, see the long-time powers dismantle, and by extension win the Super Bowl.

Would it have been better if there was no cap and the Rams didn't get Faulk and Timmerman re-signed with the Packers and more teams had cap space to bid on Trent Green and the 49ers, Packers, and Cowboys kept re-signing all of their players throughout the 1990s rather than seeing them gradually lose players every year and, by extension, the Rams didn't win the Super Bowl because there was no cap?

[Damtoft]

In direct opposition to the other major franchises in St. Louis, the Rams front office has a keen eye for young talent (with the notable exception of drafting defensive tackles).

The cap helps the Rams far more than it hurts.

[Celtic]

Yeah that Larry Phillips guy was the bomb.