Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bush Team Flubs Attack Response

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bush Team Flubs Attack Response

    This is certainly a time of testing for the Bush administration. An era fraught with political peril, marked by threats from all sides. So where's the strong leadership in these times of change? Former anti-terror chief Richard Clarke has launched scathing charges that the Bush White House has not done nearly enough to protect the American people. What's the first clue that he's right? Right now, the Bushies can't even protect themselves.

    As expected, the administration organized a rapid-fire assault on Clarke's character and credibility. But the Bush team has gone to the well one too many times with this type of ad hominem attack. The American public has watched it happen to former Ambassador Joseph Wilson when he spoke out against the yellowcake claim, former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill when he charged that the administration was putting too much focus on Iraq, and now Clarke. The pattern is clear: slime the opponent and wrap yourself in the American flag. At this point it is disturbingly obvious that the administration's quiver is out of arrows – Bush officials are reduced to making the talk show rounds armed only with the grownup equivalent of schoolyard taunts like, "I know you are, but what am I?"

    Clarke's assertions have ripped gaping holes in the administration's defense, and even an all-out media assault by the White House did nothing to repair the damages. Here's a quick rundown of quotes (and why they don't make sense) from various members of the Bush team in regards to Clarke's statements:



    MORE


    Mr. G

  • #2
    Great article Mr. G.
    2005 Mandatory Loyalty Oath: I love America, our troops, baseball, Moms, and certain pies. I want no harm to come to any of those institutions, nor do I take any glee in their demise.

    Comment


    • #3
      Indeed, a completely unbiased source.

      How laughable.
      And, frankly, it has never occured to me that "winning" a debate is important, or that I should be hurt when someone like Airshark or kah, among others (for whom winning a pseudo debate or declaring intellectual superiority over invisible others is obviously very important) ridicule me.

      -The Artist formerly known as King in KC

      Comment


      • #4
        Forget the source.

        Can it be refuted? Nope.
        His mind is not for rent, to any god or government.
        Pointless debate is what we do here -- lvr

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by moedrabowsky@Mar 24 2004, 12:42 PM
          Forget the source.

          Can it be refuted? Nope.
          Cohen and Albright pretty much refuted him yesterday from where I stand...

          "Can't buy what I want because it's free...
          Can't buy what I want because it's free..."
          -- Pearl Jam, from the single Corduroy

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Damtoft@Mar 24 2004, 12:41 PM
            Indeed, a completely unbiased source.

            How laughable.
            It is almost laughable that Cheney says Clarke was out of the loop and Rice says that they followed some of his plans.

            But even more, it's just plain sad.
            Dude. Can. Fly.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by 007+Mar 24 2004, 12:44 PM-->
              QUOTE (007 @ Mar 24 2004, 12:44 PM)

            • #8
              Originally posted by dvyyyyyy+Mar 24 2004, 12:47 PM-->
              QUOTE (dvyyyyyy @ Mar 24 2004, 12:47 PM)
              Originally posted by [email protected] 24 2004, 12:44 PM

            • #9
              Originally posted by 007+Mar 24 2004, 12:52 PM-->
              QUOTE (007 @ Mar 24 2004, 12:52 PM)
              Originally posted by [email protected] 24 2004, 12:47 PM
              Originally posted by [email protected] 24 2004, 12:44 PM

            • #10
              But they haven't refuted the contradictions coming from this administration, as highlighted by the article.

              Either Rice or Cheney (or both) are lying.
              His mind is not for rent, to any god or government.
              Pointless debate is what we do here -- lvr

              Comment


              • #11
                Originally posted by moedrabowsky@Mar 24 2004, 12:54 PM
                But they haven't refuted the contradictions coming from this administration, as highlighted by the article.

                Either Rice or Cheney (or both) are lying.
                I have a problem w/ Rice not tesifying before this committee in public...

                Sure, she did her 4 hours in private, but she's giving the perception to the public that she's got something to hide....

                "Can't buy what I want because it's free...
                Can't buy what I want because it's free..."
                -- Pearl Jam, from the single Corduroy

                Comment


                • #12
                  I have a problem w/ Rice not tesifying before this committee in public...
                  Sure, she did her 4 hours in private, but she's giving the perception to the public that she's got something to hide....
                  I agree.
                  His mind is not for rent, to any god or government.
                  Pointless debate is what we do here -- lvr

                  Comment


                  • #13
                    Isn't it worth at least questioning Clarke's motivations before believing him without question?

                    Didn't Clarke say that Rice looked as if she'd never heard of al Qaida? I heard an interview of Rice that took place in 2000 where she eloquently discussed the threat of al Qaida and bin Laden. She said the FBI and CIA need to work closer together. She also said that terrorists harbored by states are much more dangerous than terrorists with no safe-haven. This doesn't sound like a clueless person.

                    Also, since when does the Administration poorly defending itself prove guilt? That is one of the Administrations weaknesses -- not explaining things or being open enough.

                    Whether or not Clarke is correct, some of you could stand to be more objective about it.
                    "Need some wood?" -- George W. Bush, October 8, 2004

                    "Historians will judge if this war is just, not your punk ass." -- Dave Glover, December 8, 2004

                    Comment


                    • #14
                      Originally posted by phantom@Mar 24 2004, 01:03 PM
                      Isn't it worth at least questioning Clarke's motivations before believing him without question?

                      Didn't Clarke say that Rice looked as if she'd never heard of al Qaida? I heard an interview of Rice that took place in 2000 where she eloquently discussed the threat of al Qaida and bin Laden. She said the FBI and CIA need to work closer together. She also said that terrorists harbored by states are much more dangerous than terrorists with no safe-haven. This doesn't sound like a clueless person.

                      Also, since when does the Administration poorly defending itself prove guilt? That is one of the Administrations weaknesses -- not explaining things or being open enough.

                      Whether or not Clarke is correct, some of you could stand to be more objective about it.
                      DING ©

                      I was referring to public perception, phantom...I didn't say she was guilty...

                      "Can't buy what I want because it's free...
                      Can't buy what I want because it's free..."
                      -- Pearl Jam, from the single Corduroy

                      Comment


                      • #15
                        Clarke just the latest example. The Bush WH arrogantly and aggressively attacks anyone who questions their policies or methods -- regardless of whether they are long-time allies.

                        Are all of them grinding an axe? I don't think so.
                        His mind is not for rent, to any god or government.
                        Pointless debate is what we do here -- lvr

                        Comment

                        • Working...
                          X