Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Digital Camcorders

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by BringBackZezel+Mar 17 2004, 10:34 AM-->
    QUOTE (BringBackZezel @ Mar 17 2004, 10:34 AM)
    Originally posted by [email protected] 17 2004, 10:31 AM

  • #17
    I just ordered a Panasonic PV-GS50S Mini-DV yesterday from Abe's of Maine for $408.

    I believe that it is similar to your model in most respects. Smaller camcorder than most, and its one weakness is in low light situations, but that can be overcome by manual adjustments. For my purposes and that price, I thought it was a great deal. Best Buy is selling it right now for $550.

    I subscribe to Consumer Reports and it was one of the better models. Sony and Panasonic have the best repair history records, but reviews that I read on Cnet and epinions suggested that Sony's customer service sucks balls. Bought it with my AMEX and it doubled the length of the manufacturer's warranty.

    Good luck

    Moon

    Comment


    • #18
      I have a Sony TRV-22 which you can still get. The whole TRV line (19, 22, 33) are on the cheap right now since the newest line (DCR-HCx) came out. I would consider the TRVs sine they are very good.

      I did a lot of research, and I decided that Sony was the best. I had considered Canons since they have the best optical zooms among MiniDV camcorders. But I read that they don't perform that well in low light (indoors).

      I also saw less complaining with the Sonys about motor noise showing up on the tape.

      If you'll want to convert old tapes (analog) to digital, get a camera that does it. (the TRV-22 does it -- the 19 doesn't).
      "Need some wood?" -- George W. Bush, October 8, 2004

      "Historians will judge if this war is just, not your punk ass." -- Dave Glover, December 8, 2004

      Comment


      • #19
        Originally posted by phantom@Mar 17 2004, 12:55 PM
        I have a Sony TRV-22 which you can still get. The whole TRV line (19, 22, 33) are on the cheap right now since the newest line (DCR-HCx) came out. I would consider the TRVs sine they are very good.

        I did a lot of research, and I decided that Sony was the best. I had considered Canons since they have the best optical zooms among MiniDV camcorders. But I read that they don't perform that well in low light (indoors).

        I also saw less complaining with the Sonys about motor noise showing up on the tape.

        If you'll want to convert old tapes (analog) to digital, get a camera that does it. (the TRV-22 does it -- the 19 doesn't).
        yeah, i'm slowly deciding that Sony is the way to go. I really think I'll get the DCR-HC40 just because it's a new model with higher res. It will convert analog.

        I have a question about that actually. Right now I have an analog Sony camcorder that uses the Hi-8 tapes. How would I convert those using the new camcorder? Do they fit inside the camera?

        Comment


        • #20
          Originally posted by Dr.Gonzo@Mar 17 2004, 10:41 AM
          Most reviewers say the canons aren't that spectacular in low light conditions, and the image stabilizers aren't quite as good as Sony.
          It sounds like someone is planning a sex tape.
          If you believe in something sacrifice a hobo to it or don't bother.

          Comment


          • #21
            Originally posted by Dr.Gonzo+Mar 17 2004, 12:58 PM-->
            QUOTE (Dr.Gonzo @ Mar 17 2004, 12:58 PM)

          • #22
            Originally posted by Turd Ferguson+Mar 17 2004, 01:02 PM-->
            QUOTE (Turd Ferguson @ Mar 17 2004, 01:02 PM)

          • #23
            Originally posted by Turd Ferguson+Mar 17 2004, 01:02 PM-->
            QUOTE (Turd Ferguson @ Mar 17 2004, 01:02 PM)

          • #24
            Originally posted by Turd Ferguson+Mar 17 2004, 01:02 PM-->
            QUOTE (Turd Ferguson @ Mar 17 2004, 01:02 PM)

          • #25
            Originally posted by phantom@Mar 17 2004, 12:55 PM
            I have a Sony TRV-22 which you can still get. The whole TRV line (19, 22, 33) are on the cheap right now since the newest line (DCR-HCx) came out. I would consider the TRVs sine they are very good.

            I did a lot of research, and I decided that Sony was the best. I had considered Canons since they have the best optical zooms among MiniDV camcorders. But I read that they don't perform that well in low light (indoors).

            I also saw less complaining with the Sonys about motor noise showing up on the tape.

            If you'll want to convert old tapes (analog) to digital, get a camera that does it. (the TRV-22 does it -- the 19 doesn't).
            phantom, what would you consider a good price for the line you mentioned?
            Dude. Can. Fly.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by dvyyyyyy+Mar 17 2004, 01:08 PM-->
              QUOTE (dvyyyyyy @ Mar 17 2004, 01:08 PM)

            • #27
              Originally posted by Dr.Gonzo@Mar 17 2004, 01:08 PM
              What's up AWOL?


              I have your written consent, so quit your bitchin'.
              I got grote's permission to be absent. Nothing too big. Just had some family shit to deal with. Nothing too big - everyone's healthy...and maybe someday happy too.

              Was that the form I signed? I really didn't read it. I just knew that you promised me a trip to the Chuck E. Cheese if I signed.
              If you believe in something sacrifice a hobo to it or don't bother.

              Comment


              • #28
                Originally posted by phantom+Mar 17 2004, 01:19 PM-->
                QUOTE (phantom @ Mar 17 2004, 01:19 PM)
                Originally posted by [email protected] 17 2004, 01:08 PM

              • #29
                Originally posted by dvyyyyyy+Mar 17 2004, 01:20 PM-->
                QUOTE (dvyyyyyy @ Mar 17 2004, 01:20 PM)
                Originally posted by [email protected] 17 2004, 01:19 PM
                Originally posted by [email protected] 17 2004, 01:08 PM

              • #30
                Originally posted by Turd Ferguson+Mar 17 2004, 01:20 PM-->
                QUOTE (Turd Ferguson @ Mar 17 2004, 01:20 PM)
                Working...
                X