Outcry Against Bush's TV Ad

[phantom]

Bush's Ad Criticized

I have no problem with this ad. I saw it, and it was well done. Is Bush not supposed to mention how he dealt with 9/11? Please.

[BringBackZezel]

So now he's offended:
-Stern listeners
-Gays
-Sept. 11 families


all in the matter of a few weeks.


Question: Did this Ad convince ANYONE to vote for Bush? I can't imagine it did.....but it certainly took away some votes.

[phantom]

Originally posted by BringBackZezel@Mar 4 2004, 03:51 PM
So now he's offended:
-Stern listeners
-Gays
-Sept. 11 families


all in the matter of a few weeks.


Question: Did this Ad convince ANYONE to vote for Bush? I can't imagine it did.....but it certainly took away some votes.

I'm not sure those are key voting groups.

But do you think people SHOULD be offended by the ad?

[BringBackZezel]

Originally posted by phantom+Mar 4 2004, 03:57 PM-->

QUOTE(phantom @ Mar 4 2004, 03:57 PM)

[Jack Sparrow]

Originally posted by BringBackZezel@Mar 4 2004, 03:51 PM
So now he's offended:
-Stern listeners
-Gays
-Sept. 11 families

The top two of those groups, I dont give a fuck about.

And if its up to them to pick our president, well our society and nation is fucked.

We'd have debates between Ellen and some douche bag fucker named ba ba.

[BringBackZezel]

Originally posted by JackSparrow+Mar 4 2004, 04:02 PM-->

QUOTE(JackSparrow @ Mar 4 2004, 04:02 PM)

[phantom]

Originally posted by BringBackZezel@Mar 4 2004, 03:59 PM
If I lost a loved on 9/11 I would be upset that my President is attempting to profit off of the tragedy.

Profit from the tragedy? Come on. I think that's a warped way to look at it.

It was a HUGE event in our history, and he would be stupid not to remind people of how he responded to it.

Besides, we're not hearing about the families that aren't offended for good reason.

We'd have debates between Ellen and some douche bag fucker named ba ba.

[Jack Sparrow]

Originally posted by BringBackZezel@Mar 4 2004, 04:04 PM
And they're all voting for Kerry.

What does that say about him?

[BringBackZezel]

Originally posted by phantom+Mar 4 2004, 04:05 PM-->

QUOTE(phantom @ Mar 4 2004, 04:05 PM)

[BringBackZezel]

Originally posted by JackSparrow+Mar 4 2004, 04:07 PM-->

QUOTE(JackSparrow @ Mar 4 2004, 04:07 PM)

[lazydaze]

You don't see that people would be offended if their president was attempting to promote himself by bringing up memories of their dead relatives?

As if they have already forgotten.

No profit. He loses money being Prez.

Kerry does not supoprt gay marriage, why are tehy voting for him

Go nader get busy

[BringBackZezel]

Originally posted by lazydaze@Mar 4 2004, 04:12 PM

You don't see that people would be offended if their president was attempting to promote himself by bringing up memories of their dead relatives?

As if they have already forgotten.

No profit. He loses money being Prez.

Kerry does not supoprt gay marriage, why are tehy voting for him

Go nader get busy

No matter if they've fotgotten or not, they don't need reminders on TV.

Profit doesn't have to be purly financial.

Kerry will get the votes because he is not supporting constitutional bigotry, as Bush is recommending.

Nader won't even be on the ballot in most states.

[Jack Sparrow]

Originally posted by BringBackZezel@Mar 4 2004, 04:10 PM
That he will be your next President.

Some people not smart enough to chase the opposite sex, arent smart enough to vote.

some people that listen to Howard stern arent smart enough to vote.

Some people that listen to howard stern arent old enough to vote.



Those groups, I hope, are not what you are banking on for Kerry to win, are you?

[BringBackZezel]

Originally posted by JackSparrow+Mar 4 2004, 04:16 PM-->

QUOTE(JackSparrow @ Mar 4 2004, 04:16 PM)

[Iowa_Card]

Two things:

1) If Bush has the time to have 9/11 plastered on his ad, then he has time to give that public interview that the 9/11 commission is requesting.

2) If Bush is claiming that he performed some superhuman feat by going after Al Queda, then shouldn't Kerry get just as much credit considering Bush couldn't use force unless Congress authorized it?