This from the latest SI, in the "Scout's Take" section.....
I found that interesting in light of the argument between the NBA-heads concerning Van Horn's alleged softness.
The misconception about Van Horn is that he's soft. The truth is that he's overpaid making $43.5 million through 2005-06], and he's a poor defender because he's slow and unathletic, but that doesn't make him soft. Unlike the guy he was traded for, Tim Thomas -- now there's a soft player -- Van Horn doesn't back down from anything. Milwaukee pushes the tempo, shares the ball and plays help defense, and all of that fits Van Horn's game. He'll be a more prodctive rebounder and scorer than Thomas was, which means that people may focus on his strengths instead of his weaknesses.
Comment